header-logo header-logo

23 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Patents
printer mail-detail

No hope for Unified Patent Court?

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) dream is over, lawyers say

The German Federal Constitutional Court has upheld a constitutional complaint filed against the country’s Unified Patent Court (UPC) legislation on the basis the required two thirds majority quorum in the German parliament was not achieved. It concluded this week that the Act of Approval was null and void.

The UPC was to be a court common to the contracting member states, enabling inventors to register one unified patent enforceable throughout the UPC jurisdiction. 

However, the UK confirmed in February it would not be seeking involvement in the UPC, despite ratifying the underlying agreement in 2018.

Michael Edenborough QC, barrister at Serle Court, said: ‘The German Constitutional Court has upheld an objection to Germany joining the UPC Agreement.

‘This, coupled with the recent news that the UK will now withdraw from the UPC (because it refuses to be part of any system over which the CJEU has oversight), almost certainly means that the UPC is finished. Without the UK and Germany, who are the largest patent jurisdictions in Europe, the UPC becomes an almost worthless shell of the dream of a pan-European patent court system.

‘The other countries have neither the volume of cases, nor expertise, to maintain a useful system.’

Categories: Legal News , Patents
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll