header-logo header-logo

22 January 2020
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

No conflict here

Lawyers have been given the green light to act for both parties when drafting consensual family court judgments

Mr Justice Mostyn held, in JK v MK [2020] EWFC 2, this week, that there was no conflict of interest in jointly drafting consent orders.

According to the International Family Law Group, which represented online services provider amicable in the case pro bono, couples often seek help jointly when they have reached an agreement and want it reflected in court orders. Partner David Hodson said it was ‘frustrating’ for couples, having reached agreement, ‘then to be told they must each instruct a separate lawyer… Many can’t afford it’.

The decision also confirms that this work is not solely restricted to solicitors, and online service providers can draft family court orders using computer-based processes.

Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll