header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: The Disclosure Pilot Scheme―almost midway, how is it going?

23 October 2020
Issue: 7907 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Disclosure , E-disclosure
printer mail-detail
Litigation specialists present their views on how the Disclosure Pilot Scheme is working for judges and lawyers, in this week’s NLJ

The pilot, launched in January 2019 and now extended until the end of 2021, aims to change the way litigators approach the disclosure of documents and other materials relevant to their case. It tries to encourage sensible cooperation, reduce costs where possible, use technology to prevent quantities of documentation spiralling out of control and help parties focus on issue-based disclosure.

But how effective has it been, what challenges have arisen and how have litigators responded?

In a three-page article, Tracey Stretton, managing director of business consultancy Ankura, Mark Surguy, partner at Weightmans, and Johnny Shearman, professional support lawyer at Signature Litigation, analyse progress so far.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll