header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Successive contracts, fairness for one & TUPE—simples!

12 July 2024
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
181429

Time-travelling (for purposes of calculating the national minimum wage), successive fixed-terms contracts, a ‘pool of one’ redundancy and ‘economic activity’ are all covered in this week’s NLJ employment brief

Ian Smith, professor of employment law at Norwich Law School, UEA, looks at four recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) cases. First, under what justification can an employer keep someone, a locum consultant, on successive fixed-term contracts for four years without them becoming an employee? Smith notes ‘there has been little case law on this for several years’, so the decision is of interest as a factual example.

Other cases considered whether employees should be paid for time spent on a poultry farm bus to their sheds, redundancy unfairness and what qualifies as ‘economic activity’ under TUPE.

Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll