header-logo header-logo

20 May 2022
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Sanctions, spot-checks, ethics―lawyers & the conflict in Ukraine

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has prompted some interesting ethical questions among practitioners, particularly those with oligarch clients

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Tom Bedford and Chris Dyke, partners at DAC Beachcroft, note the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) ‘has not told firms not to act for Russian nationals’. Instead, it ‘understandably but unhelpfully, says that each case will depend on its individual circumstances’.

Of course, firms should be extra-alert to sanctions guidance while the conflict is ongoing, but what is that guidance? Bedford and Dyke look at the rules, the SRA’s approach and the response from firms. The SRA is carrying out spot-checks and firms that fall foul may face sanctions themselves.

Bedford and Dyke write: ‘In particular, [the SRA] has reminded firms that their duties to clients must not take priority over their public interest obligations.

‘This follows concerns over ‘strategic litigation against public participation’ or ‘SLAPPs’. Further legislation is likely to follow in this area, prompted partly from attempts by Russian oligarchs to use litigation as a weapon.’
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll