header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Pro bono specifics for boutiques & trainees

12 August 2022
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
90467
Working pro bono benefits everyone―client, lawyer, firm and wider community. In a special NLJ pro bono double-bill this week, we highlight the advantages of this legal tradition

Vaiben Lipman, associate at LK Law, explains how boutique firms are in an ideal position to create a dedicated pro bono practice, helping practitioners to develop professionally within and without their niche and using their specialist expertise to serve society more broadly.

Joy-Emma Martin, trainee at Reed Smith, reports how her pro bono seat at a large commercial firm deepened her connection with the firm, boosted her confidence, developed her skills and gave her an opportunity to help others.

Martin says: ‘As my involvement in different aspects of the practice grew, so did my passion for the work. I also felt more connected to the firm as a whole, pro bono being central to its culture.’ See p18 and p19.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll