header-logo header-logo

21 June 2024
Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Employment , Tribunals , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Prepare for the rising number of work-from-home claims

177932

Flexible working features in an increasing number of employment law claims, write Rachel Crasnow KC and Imogen Brown, of Cloisters Chambers, in this week’s NLJ

Moreover, changes to the law on the right to work from home where feasible are likely to be proposed, should Labour win the general election.

The message for employers, therefore, is loud and clear: make sure you know what you’re doing on flexible working.

Crasnow and Brown, both specialist discrimination law counsel, look at the law as it currently stands, covering the most recent cases in this area, and look ahead to possible developments after the election.

Using a Q&A format, they provide a practical guide on what to do when presented with flexible working requests, and how a case might play out at tribunal, for example, ‘My childcare responsibilities mean I need to work from home’, ‘health reasons mean I need to work from home’, or ‘I work just as productively at home so why should I come in?’

Crasnow and Brown write: ‘Amid current political and legal ambiguity, one thing remains certain: work-from-home claims are on the rise, and practitioners need to prepare for the fallout that will result.’

They recommend employers and employees, and their representatives, stay updated on emerging case law in this area, as well, of course, as any legislative developments.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll