header-logo header-logo

17 June 2020
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Legal marketing post-lockdown

Legal marketing has become a major preoccupation for lawyers as they jostle for position in the post-lockdown landscape

The impact of COVID-19 on future business development, travel, networking and pitching for work remains to be seen, while the extent of the anticipated economic downturn is another unknown. Amid the uncertainty, legal businesses are investing in marketing and promotions to ensure they are in a position to take advantage of opportunities that arise.

Clare Rodway, Kysen PR, said: ‘As we come out of lockdown, there will be a land grab for market position in both the legal profession and the wider business world.

‘The competitive landscape is going to be very different. Some firms and businesses will have gone bust, others will have changed beyond recognition, while the move to more digital working has accelerated exponentially.’

But how do firms and chambers make the most effective use of their marketing budgets?

Serle Court CEO, John Petrie, believes changes to the business landscape could last 18 months or more. His chambers has switched its marketing activities to online events such as virtual conferences. However, he predicts ‘the more significant challenge will come as we emerge from social distancing in determining what mix of the old and the new provides the best output’.

Ruth Napier, director of business development & marketing at Cripps Pemberton Greenish, explains that the key to smart digital marketing in the current climate is getting the tone, relevance and frequency right. She highlights the importance of engagement with clients and prospects after each marketing event.

Legal marketing and communications specialists share their thoughts and advice in this week’s issue feature for us by Grania Langdon Down.

Issue: 7891 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll