header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Judicial review—the Bill, the concerns & impact on judges

30 July 2021
Issue: 7943 / Categories: Legal News , Judicial review , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
53845
How much of a concern is the government’s Judicial Review and Courts Bill? Some people expected worse. Others think the Bill is a big enough threat as it is

Writing in NLJ this week, Michael Zander QC, Emeritus professor, LSE, considers what’s included, what’s not and the level of discretion being given to judges.

The Bill overturns the Supreme Court’s decision in Cart, blocking off an avenue of challenge where the Upper Tribunal has refused permission to appeal, and gives more power to judges to suspend or limit the retrospective application of quashing orders.

Zander writes that ‘the judges retain their discretion, but subss (9) and (10) are plainly aimed at getting them to make suspended and/or prospective quashing orders. Traditionally, the courts have done so very rarely.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll