header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Jackson ten years later: what worked & what didn’t?

12 May 2023
Issue: 8024 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , CPR , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
121674
Ten years ago, Sir Rupert Jackson’s civil costs review was a seismic event. How well have the ground-breaking reforms fared since? NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan takes a look at the Jackson legacy.

From budgeting to the end of recoverability to the impending extension of fixed costs (due to take place on 1 October 2023), the reforms have been accompanied by ‘teething problems’ and setbacks as well as big successes. Regan, of City Law School, identifies some highs and lows from the speeding up of dispute resolution timescales to the rise of Check My Legal Fees.

Regan, who acted as an adviser to Sir Rupert on the review, notes that ‘some wise reforms appear to have been ignored’ and asserts there is still ‘plenty of work to do’. 

Read Regan's reflections on the ground-breaking reforms here.

Issue: 8024 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , CPR , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll