header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Identify the tenant correctly or notice to quit will fail

13 January 2023
Issue: 8008 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail
106315
The mysterious case of the misidentified tenant is the subject of an NLJ article this week by Falcon Chambers barristers Caroline Shea KC & Thomas Rothwell. 

The issue arose after a tenant farmer lawfully assigned his tenancy to a company but didn’t inform his landlord. His landlord then served notice to quit on him but not to his company. The farmer then disputed the validity of the notice.

The Court of Appeal took a strict approach, overturning the courts below. Shea & Rothwell cover the case and its implications for the future. They write the case ‘has provided useful clarification on the need to distinguish verbal from factual mistakes, and what the consequences of each kind of mistake might be’. 

Read Shea & Rothwell's full article here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll