header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Future law tech, access to justice & the need for humans

23 June 2023
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
127514
NLJ columnist Roger Smith reviews legal technology specialist Professor Richard Susskind’s latest book through an access to justice lens, in this week’s issue.

Professor Susskind (pictured), who predicted the rise of lawtech, recently published the third edition of Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to your Future (Oxford University Press, 2023). In his review, Smith praises his ‘engaging, polemical and interesting’ work, but notes that, on the issue of widening access to justice, ‘his analysis proceeds at such speed that some problems are overlooked or oversimplified’.

Smith draws conclusions on the question of whether the advice sector and civil legal aid will need fewer lawyers in future—read more here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll