header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Five decades of ambitions for one-parent families

04 July 2024
Issue: 8078 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Family , Mediation , Child law
printer mail-detail
180621

It’s 50 years since the 1974 Finer Report of the Committee on One-Parent Families, so what has been achieved?

In this week’s NLJ, solicitor-advocate David Burrows considers a half-century of reforms.

One big change has been the role of mediation. But in many aspects, life has not improved enough. Burrows looks at the areas of finance, housing, employment and day care, family law and a unified family court. He writes: ‘In the 50 years since the report, things for single parents and their children have mostly gone backwards.’

So, what has been done and what is still to do? Burrows covers developments and setbacks.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll