header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Cynical builders

26 November 2020
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail
32874
Lessons can be learned from a recent Supreme Court judgment on restrictive covenants, according to Andrew Francis, barrister, Serle Court
Writing in NLJ this week, Francis considers the ruling in Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions [2020] UKSC 45.

The case concerned a property company who built on land near a children’s hospice. The buildings included 13 affordable houses on land burdened by restrictive covenants. The company applied to modify the covenants only after the houses were built.

Francis discusses what the court decided and why, and sets out some important lessons that can be learned from the case.

@Serle_Court
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
The Bar has a culture of ‘impunity’ and ‘collusive bystanding’ in which making a complaint is deemed career-ending due to a ‘cohort of untouchables’ at the top, Baroness Harriet Harman KC has found
Lawyers have broadly welcomed plans to electronically tag up to 22,000 more offenders, scrap most prison terms below a year and make prisoners ‘earn’ early release
The ex-wife of a Russian billionaire has won her bid to bring her financial relief claim in London, in a unanimous Court of Appeal decision
back-to-top-scroll