header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Costs, budget, estimate…important distinctions for prudent litigators

13 January 2023
Issue: 8008 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
106297
Solicitors do not always understand the difference between an estimate and a budget, but it’s an important distinction, writes Jack Ridgway, chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week’s NLJ.

Ridgway, a senior costs lawyer at Bolt Burdon Kemp, explains the difference and its importance. Moreover, ‘costs can be reasonable but disproportionate’. He writes: ‘Unfortunately, when the court chose to replace costs estimates with budgets, they deprived the solicitor of the opportunity to kill two birds with one stone, instead creating two distinct stones.’

His article, available here, is clear and easy to understand and will be helpful for all litigators tasked with setting budgets.
Issue: 8008 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll