header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Churchill mediation mega-case leaves ‘stones unturned’

153978
The Churchill v Merthyr Borough Council case has clarified the position on judge-mandated mediation—or has it?

In this week’s NLJ, Newcastle University’s Bryan Clark, professor of law and civil justice, and Zora Kizilyurek, visiting lecturer, study the decision and conclude that several issues remain unresolved.

Churchill, which finds a judge can order parties to mediate, overturns Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust, which found a judge could not. The decision has been greeted with alacrity by mediators and other staunch proponents of settling disputes in less expensively acrimonious settings than a courtroom. As Clark and Kizilyurek write, it is a ‘seminal decision’.

However, the authors continue: ‘Several stones remain unturned… The circumstances in which it would be improper for a judge to order parties to undertake an ADR process remains unclear with the matter of proportionality likely to be a live issue in cases to come.’ 

Issue: 8055 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll