header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Torrents of filthy water

04 October 2024
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Public , In Court
printer mail-detail
191471

Richard Buckley considers the affluent (water companies) and the effluent (sewage disgustingly discharged into public waterways) in this week’s NLJ

Pollution of England’s rivers and waterways is, unfortunately, a topical issue. But how do you pin down those responsible and make them repair the infrastructure so it stops?

Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law, University of Reading, looks at two major cases, 20 years apart, regarding this problem. He addresses the question: ‘Should water companies, when acting as sewerage operators, be subject to the ordinary law of nuisance when foul water escapes from their land on to that of their neighbours? Or should they enjoy some special immunity from common law liability?’

Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Public , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll