header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Cyber drills build real-world resilience

28 November 2025
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber , Technology , Risk management , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail
237018
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week

Static compliance documents give the illusion of readiness, but real-world crises demand reflex, not reference.

Morris advocates immersive tabletop simulations—interactive exercises mirroring genuine breaches—to train teams under pressure. Such drills expose procedural gaps, align decision-makers and test legal, technical and communications responses in real time. For lawyers, they reveal how clients truly behave in crisis; for insurers, they sharpen risk pricing and reward preparedness.

These simulations transform organisations from passive planners to active defenders, making legal departments proactive partners in governance. The message: cyber resilience isn’t written—it’s rehearsed.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll