header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Alarm bells over Mazur

05 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
237727
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week

He describes a bewildering situation in which long-trusted legal executives, once central to litigation teams, now risk being side-lined as mere ‘ciphers’. He traces the problem to regulatory drift following the Legal Services Act 2007 and the growth of mass-market litigation models fuelled by ‘no win no fee’ practices.

Meanwhile, unqualified caseworkers in some modern claims factories are producing erroneous witness statements referencing vehicles or banks that never existed.

Philpott argues that the solution is simple: the regulator must restore clarity by confirming that all qualified CILEX members have rights to conduct litigation. With professions unsettled and livelihoods at stake, he suggests that intervention in the Mazur appeal may yet provide a much-needed corrective.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll