header-logo header-logo

20 November 2019
Categories: Profession , Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

NLJ PROFILE: Sue Nightingale

Sue Nightingale, a forensic accountant at Stowe Family Law LLP, explains why she values independence & how she makes the most of precious free time

What was your route into the profession?

I read Maths at university and vowed never to become an accountant. That didn’t last long as at 21 I wasn’t ready to stop learning and rather than do more maths, I opted for the chartered accountancy qualification as it opens lots of doors.  I always wanted to specialise in forensic accounting though as it utilises my analytical and problem-solving skills.  After qualifying, I spent 11 years with a Big Four forensic team working on high profile international investigations and quantifying losses in the context of complex, high-value commercial litigation.  After starting a family, I realised it was time for a change and moved to a Surrey based accounting firm where I focused on expert witness work in the context of commercial litigation and divorce.  The opportunity then came along to move to Stowe Family Law, to lead and grow their in-house forensic team. Stowe Family Law is the largest specialist family law firm in the UK and continues to grow, so it is a really exciting opportunity to specialise in divorce finance cases and work hand-in-hand with my clients, who can often struggle to get to grips with high value and complex financial and business assets.        

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

There have been lots of challenging cases - that’s what makes my work interesting (lots of brain ache).  But in terms of my career, probably the biggest challenge was making the decision to move in-house.  I was really happy where I was, doing what I love, had just been promoted and was working with a fantastic forensic team.  I wasn’t looking for anything else.  But when the opportunity to move to Stowe came along it was too good to pass on.  I work alongside lots of brilliant lawyers at Stowe, but that’s just it, they’re lawyers, not accountants.  We look at things from a different angle, so when I’m looking into the weird and the wonderful of the finance world and need to bounce ideas around it can sometimes feel a bit lonely.  I better get on and build a great forensic team.

Which person within the profession inspires you most?

I’m lucky to have worked with lots of fantastic forensic accountants during my career.  I won’t name names as I now instruct some of them in my in-house role, but the ones that inspire me most are the ones who have tons of experience, have been there, done that, yet remain open-minded and are willing to learn from those around them and admit they might be wrong.  One of the keys to being a successful expert witness is independence - being able to see things from both sides and forming your own view based on the evidence, which isn’t always the same as the view of your paying client!   

If you weren’t an accountant, what would you choose as an alternate career?

Well I also vowed never to be a teacher, but probably another career where I can use my skills to help people – maybe a police detective.

What change would you make to the profession?

More use of single joint experts in commercial litigation or getting party-appointed experts together earlier on in the dispute process for without prejudice discussions so that they can agree on the issues in the case and reasonable assumptions to adopt where it is necessary to do so.  Hot-tubbing of experts has been a step in the right direction but there is still more that can be done.

How do you relax?

With two small children to run around after it sometimes feels like I come to work to relax.  But no, in all seriousness, I enjoy family time out in the fresh air away from phones, ipads, laptops and all the other gadgets that could so easily occupy all of my precious ‘spare’ time.  

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll