header-logo header-logo

The NLJ Column

12 July 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

It’s time to recognise the benefits of restorative justice

Until recently, restorative justice has been on the fringes of penal reform. However, some eminent support has recently been given for the principle. Most notably, the Archbishop of Canterbury spoke at a recent lecture organised by the Prison Reform Trust, supporting the introduction of restorative justice into the mainstream of sentencing policy.

The main thrust of the restorative justice approach is that victim can confront offender. This is considered primarily to benefit the victims of crime by enabling them to meet, and to some extent demystify, the perpetrators of crime. It has also been considered to be of assistance to the offender, who is also confronted with the consequence of their actions.

One of the main criticisms of the restorative justice regime has been that the victim has had little control or influence over its process. Furthermore, and significantly, it has been perceived to be a soft option.
These issues have recently been addressed, particularly as a result of the government’s “victim led” approach to criminal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll