header-logo header-logo

24 November 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-detail

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert & head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law & digging into the stories behind the scenes

What was your route into the profession?

It was a traditional start—reading law at university, LPC and training at Addleshaw Goddard, before pursuing roles in corporate finance and the C-suite.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Returning to a General Counsel role at Quindell in 2014 after nearly 15 years of investment banking, listed company boards and a CEO role. However, I believe those experiences helped me win GC of the Year a year later.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Lord Pannick KC—if he wins the Manchester City 115 case!

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I like forensic analysis of business, the stories behind the scenes and financials, so perhaps financial investigative journalism or crisis management. I enjoy unpacking complex issues for broader audiences, which is why I now write and broadcast on football finance and regulation.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Saul Goodman!

What change would you make to the profession?

Having paid the bills for years, there must be a better way to value the skills of lawyers than billing by the minute, which incentivises the wrong practices.

How do you relax?

Mainly football, running, and gazing out to sea.


Stefan Borson is head of sport at McCarthy Denning.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll