header-logo header-logo

NFT gaming: the future for Sony?

16 June 2023 / Prakash Kerai , Joe Stephenson
Issue: 8029 / Categories: Features , Technology , Cyber
printer mail-detail
126373
Prakash Kerai & Joe Stephenson outline Sony’s potential new approach to virtual asset transfer, & the legal hurdles which could stand in the way
  • Sony’s ground-breaking patent application hints at using NFTs to transfer virtual assets between games and consoles, potentially revolutionising the gaming industry.
  • The move signifies a shift in the gaming industry’s conservative approach to NFTs and opens doors for interoperability with other platforms beyond its own ecosystem.
  • However, legal hurdles including anti-money laundering, financial regulation, data protection, and intellectual property rights must be navigated for a successful implementation.

Sony Interactive Entertainment recently made headlines with the publication of an international patent application to make non-fungible tokens (NFTs) transferable between games and consoles.

Despite an initial 2021 popularity boom, 2022 saw a dramatic decline in the trading volumes of NFTs. While the downturn has been touted by some commentators as having ‘fallen off a cliff’, Sony’s patent application may be seen as indicative of a diversification of use-cases for NFTs. Thus far, the gaming

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll