header-logo header-logo

12 February 2009
Issue: 7356 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

News

Love: the Chancery Lane way; Supreme Court fees; Money laundering costs

Love: the Chancery Lane way
While couples dream up ever-more perfect ways to spend Valentine’s Day, the Law Society has launched an unromantic broadside. Neatly sidestepping Cupid’s arrow, the Society issued a ten-point guide to the law, urging couples to “love with your heart, think with your head”. Its advice includes naming both partners on the rental agreement; insuring your wedding ceremony; setting up a joint bank account; and being sure before you buy an engagement ring.

Supreme Court fees
The system of fees and concessions for civil and devolution cases in the Supreme Court has been set out by the Ministry of Justice in a consultation paper, “Fees in the UK Supreme Court”. The court becomes operational in October 2009. The proposed fees have been pitched at a level to recognise the benefi ts of the court for the “generality” of litigants in the civil court system in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and include a contribution from Scotland. The annual running costs of the court are estimated to be about £6.6m. The consultation ends on 5 May 2009.
 

Money laundering costs
The Law Society has urged the government to rethink its anti-money laundering regime. In evidence presented to the House of Lords home affairs sub-committee this week, the Society highlighted the heavy compliance burdens placed on solicitors and the fact no detailed cost/benefit analysis has been undertaken. It said evidence from solicitors suggests the regulated sector is spending significantly more on compliance than the UK government is recovering in criminal property.

Issue: 7356 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll