header-logo header-logo

New review

05 September 2014 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
public_davies

Keith Davies examines the development of the principle of judicial review in English courts

Judicial review is a term not known to English or UK law until very recent times, ie 1977, in secondary legislation, namely the Rules of the Supreme Court (Amendment No 3) 1977 (SI 1977/1955), Ord 53. In primary legislation it then appeared in the Supreme Court Act 1981 (now re-titled the Senior Courts Act 1981) s 31(1): “A procedure to be known as an application for judicial review.”

Origins

The procedure, though not the title, is in essence very old, dating back to medieval times as part of a larger grouping of “prerogative orders” including other orders such as “habeas corpus”, previously termed “prerogative writs” issued by the Crown to correct errors made by inferior courts (eg magistrates) and all other public bodies up to the level of ministers of the Crown. The common law is created by the Crown in Parliament to be administered by the highest courts of common law and equity, the central judiciary of the UK.

“Judicial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll