header-logo header-logo

New device predicts personal injury outcomes

07 November 2014
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hodge, Jones & Allen (HJA) has engineered a device that can calculate the likely outcomes of personal injury cases.  

The 200-staff London firm asked Andrew Chesher, professor of economics and economic measurement at University College London, to examine 600 cases concluded over a 12-month period using statistical techniques to determine the factors contributing to success or failure and level of damages and costs. 

Prof Chesher’s analysis took into account the demographics of the claimant, the nature and cause of injury, the type of defendant, the quality of the defendant’s solicitors, the level of solicitor handling the case, the number and type of witnesses, the corroborating evidence available, the reporting of cases to authorities and hospitals, and the time between injury and instruction. 

The results of the analysis have been converted into Excel-based programmes able to predict the likelihood of cases being won.
Initial assessments of cases are critical to the success of personal injury practices because the Jackson reforms have required both sides of a dispute to provide up-front costs estimates. 

Prof Chesher says: “There are complex interactions between many of the variables we analysed and, as with many markets where human judgement is involved, there is always an element of unpredictability. 

“However, particularly with the model predicting the likelihood of a case being won or lost, we were able to produce robust models that will improve over time as further data is collected.” 

Interestingly, the analysis showed that the age and working status of the claimant is important in predicting outcomes, as well as the existence of some gender bias. The length of time between injury and instruction also has an impact. Witnesses and reliable evidence were not instrumental in predicting a win or loss but were important in obtaining higher damages. 

Patrick Allen, senior oartner of HJA, says the models will not replace the experience and judgment of the firm’s enquiry handling team but would give them “an additional aid”.

Matt Cuell, HJA’s personal injury team manager, says the modelling “challenged some of our prejudices about the cases we should be taking on”.

 

Issue: 7630 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll