header-logo header-logo

07 November 2014
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New device predicts personal injury outcomes

Hodge, Jones & Allen (HJA) has engineered a device that can calculate the likely outcomes of personal injury cases.  

The 200-staff London firm asked Andrew Chesher, professor of economics and economic measurement at University College London, to examine 600 cases concluded over a 12-month period using statistical techniques to determine the factors contributing to success or failure and level of damages and costs. 

Prof Chesher’s analysis took into account the demographics of the claimant, the nature and cause of injury, the type of defendant, the quality of the defendant’s solicitors, the level of solicitor handling the case, the number and type of witnesses, the corroborating evidence available, the reporting of cases to authorities and hospitals, and the time between injury and instruction. 

The results of the analysis have been converted into Excel-based programmes able to predict the likelihood of cases being won.
Initial assessments of cases are critical to the success of personal injury practices because the Jackson reforms have required both sides of a dispute to provide up-front costs estimates. 

Prof Chesher says: “There are complex interactions between many of the variables we analysed and, as with many markets where human judgement is involved, there is always an element of unpredictability. 

“However, particularly with the model predicting the likelihood of a case being won or lost, we were able to produce robust models that will improve over time as further data is collected.” 

Interestingly, the analysis showed that the age and working status of the claimant is important in predicting outcomes, as well as the existence of some gender bias. The length of time between injury and instruction also has an impact. Witnesses and reliable evidence were not instrumental in predicting a win or loss but were important in obtaining higher damages. 

Patrick Allen, senior oartner of HJA, says the models will not replace the experience and judgment of the firm’s enquiry handling team but would give them “an additional aid”.

Matt Cuell, HJA’s personal injury team manager, says the modelling “challenged some of our prejudices about the cases we should be taking on”.

 

Issue: 7630 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll