header-logo header-logo

The new deal?

24 May 2012 / Simon Love
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Simon Love assesses the proposed new role for SRA Compensation Fund

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Compensation Fund is a central element of the regime by which the solicitors profession protects the financial interests of its clients. Economic hard times have increased the fund’s workload: mortgage lenders have brought high volumes of claims against solicitors arising out of fraudulent transactions, and following declinature of cover by the firms’ professional indemnity insurers, many of those have been switched to the fund; the recession has caused the failure of a number of law firms; and planned changes to the profession’s indemnity insurance arrangements will impact further on the fund and present fresh challenges.

In this article I will take a look at the Compensation Fund, its rules and how it operates at present. I will then go on to highlight the planned changes to the operation of the fund, the background to those, and the impact on the fund in the future.

SRA Compensation Fund

The Compensation Fund is a discretionary scheme established under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll