header-logo header-logo

Neurodiversity guidance published

05 February 2025
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail
The Family Justice Council (FJC) has published guidance on neurodiversity for legal practitioners.

The FJC said about 15% of the population are neurodivergent, and this figure is likely to underestimate neurodivergent family justice system users.

In his foreword, Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the Family Division, said: ‘It is clear that the failure to recognise and accommodate neurodivergence within the family justice system leads to parties, witnesses and children not being able to participate fully. Equal access to justice is fundamental to a functioning and fair system.’

Find the guidance online here.

Issue: 8103 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll