header-logo header-logo

A neat alternative

28 April 2011 / George Woods
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

A director’s guarantee is a useful option where a security for costs application is likely to be rejected, says George Woods

Applications for security for costs are usually made early in the proceedings and applicants are encouraged not to leave them until the trial approaches.
In Inventors Friend v Leathes Prior [unreported] an application was made two weeks before the anticipated trial date for the substantive claim and was heard less than one week before that date. The claimant argued that such an application was late and would stifle the claim. The defendant agreed to accept a personal guarantee from a director of the claimant rather than require the sums actually be raised.

The court felt such an order would not stifle the claim, and gave the defendant some comfort as to payment of its costs. Any risk as to the value of such a guarantee fell on the defendant who was happy to accept such a risk as a price of obtaining the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll