header-logo header-logo

Navigating Pt 36: challenges & pitfalls

05 May 2021 / Helen Armstrong , William Rowell
Issue: 7931 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
48176
Part 36 settlement offers: Helen Armstrong & William Rowell outline how to avoid the pitfalls
  • Part 36 regime: an influential settlement weapon.
  • Recent judgments: outlining the highly complex area for parties and their advisers.

The Pt 36 regime is arguably one of the most influential weapons in the Civil Procedure Rules’ (CPR) arsenal for encouraging settlement. It provides a statutory code of prescribed costs, damages and interest enhancements that essentially penalise parties who fail to accept a reasonable settlement offer.

The rules relating to Pt 36 offers are, however, very complex. There are various formal requirements for making an offer. Parties may inadvertently (and unknowingly) fail to make a compliant Pt 36 offer and cannot benefit from the enhanced costs consequences they had envisaged. Even where an offer is compliant, if it would be ‘unjust’ to award the prescribed benefits, the court can disapply them. The whole regime becomes a procedural minefield.

A series of recent judgments illustrates how difficult this area can be for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll