header-logo header-logo

03 November 2017 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Navigating a path to independence

nlj_7768_aamodt

Who decides when somewhere attains statehood? Athelstane Aamodt shares some lessons from the past

In the classic 1949 Ealing comedy Passport to Pimlico , a small part of London (Pimlico) declares itself independent from the rest of the UK on the basis that the residents discover an old manuscript that reveals that where they live is actually part of the Duchy of Burgundy. The new-found independence of Pimlico causes all sorts of problems and after many Ealing-comedy-type shenanigans, Pimlico—predictably —re-joins the UK.

The basis for the film is alleged to come from a real incident in Canada when in 1943 the maternity ward of a hospital was temporarily declared not to be part of Canada by the Canadian government so that when Princess Juliana of the Netherlands gave birth, the baby (Princess Margriet) was born on Dutch territory, and would not lose her right to the Dutch throne. Scenarios—real or imagined—such as these raise interesting legal and conceptual issues.

How does somewhere become a country?

Given the recent referendums on independence held in Iraqi

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll