header-logo header-logo

Myerson's market confidence

30 April 2009 / Catherine Costley
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Declining assets are unlikely to pass the Barder test, says Catherine Costley

* * * * * *

With the credit crunch biting hard and the global economy in decline, the Court of Appeal's judgment in the case of Myerson v Myerson [2009] EWCA Civ 282, [2009] All ER (D) 05 (Apr) failed to bring relief for divorcing clients who, in more settled times, had agreed settlements involving risky assets. There are no easy solutions for clients returning to question the validity of agreements which now look like very bad deals as it is highly unlikely that the falling value of assets will be considered a Barder event (see below) which changes the basis of a financial order. Although the court may have a certain amount of sympathy for those who have lost out because of fluctuations in value, the principle of certainty and finality of capital orders will generally be upheld even in these troubled times.

Background

The original order which was made by consent after agreement was reached at the financial dispute

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll