header-logo header-logo

Multi-jurisdictional cases in England & Russia (Pt 2)

50767
Anna Grishchenkova, Daniel Burbeary & Irina Buydova explore the impact of cultural & psychological differences in international dispute resolution
  • In disputes involving multiple parties of different nationalities, cultural and psychological differences can play a major part in misunderstandings both between parties and the court, and the parties themselves.

International dispute resolution is complex and involves balancing a host of differences between parties, their legal advisers, the court or tribunal, and the arbitral institutions themselves. Cultural differences can play a major part in misunderstandings between parties. Different expectations of the range of possible outcomes and tactics can create friction between a party and its legal advisers. Moreover, the consequences of a party’s actions in terms of how they present to the tribunal can be significant—in some cases, even proving fatal to their case.

This article will examine how psychological factors can impact significantly on the resolution of international disputes. Psychological tools provide valuable insights into how parties, their lawyers and the tribunal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll