header-logo header-logo

15 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Motor insurance law change

The European Commission (EC) is proposing major reforms to the Motor Insurance Directive.

On 8 June, it announced its intention to act quickly to limit the impact of the European Court of Justice’s decision in Vnuk, that among other things extended compulsory third party motor insurance to use on private property. According to Nicholas Bevan, solicitor and motor insurance specialist, the “most likely outcome” will be to restrict this requirement to areas where the public have access and to traffic scenarios.

Second, the EC plans to launch an extensive review of the Directive, how it has been applied in different jurisdictions and what can be done to ensure it is implemented consistently. According to Bevan, this could take up to two years.

Bevan says: “This wide-ranging review follows on from a detailed infringement complaint at the EC against the UK for its systemic infringements of the directive.

“I understand that the UK argued that it was being unfairly singled out for scrutiny by the EC’s investigation following my complaint and so the EC decided to widen the scope of its enquiry to include other jurisdictions. All this began with four articles in the NLJ: On the right road? [see links below], which triggered the Department for Transport review of the Motor Insurance Bureau agreements, the complaint and latterly an ongoing judicial review. Ultimately, we are likely to see much greater clarity and consistency which will benefit insurers, consumers and accident victims alike.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll