header-logo header-logo

01 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

More Crown Court days announced

Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to a Ministry of Justice decision to increase Crown Court sitting days

Lord Chancellor David Lammy confirmed this week the cap on sitting days will be raised from 110,000 to a total of 111,250 days next year.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, described the move as ‘a positive step’ but called for ‘no limit to the number of days that courts can sit’.

The Crown Court backlog has reached a record high of 78,329 cases, according to government statistics published last week, with some trial dates being set as far ahead as 2029. For comparison, the backlog stood at 38,000 cases in 2019.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said the increase was ‘a welcome step’ but called for long-term investment across the criminal justice system to get the service ‘back on its feet’.

Sitting days were capped at 105,000 in September 2024, but increased by 2,000 days in December and raised to 110,000 in March 2025.

Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll