header-logo header-logo

More than the bottom line

24 July 2008 / Bill Davies
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Bill Davies reflects on enlightened shareholder value on Oxford Street

On Monday 23 June 2008 the BBC Panorama programme reported that Indian suppliers of the high-street chain Primark had been sub-contracting work to firms who used child labour.

Primark had previously issued a statement saying that this sub-contracting had occurred without its knowledge or consent and was forbidden by its code of practice. Primark also stated that they had been let down by three trusted suppliers and had terminated their contracts.

Primark also announced plans to appoint a non-governmental organisation to improve the monitoring system that it already had in place. In addition, Primark is setting up a charity to help young people in the areas in which it operates.

The speed with which Primark has acted is not surprising given the amount of bad publicity generated. The viewing figures suggest that 4.1 million viewers tuned in and the story has provided excellent copy for the national press.

Primark's swift action may well mean that it suffers no lasting damage. This case nevertheless

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll