header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008 / Bill Davies
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

More than the bottom line

Bill Davies reflects on enlightened shareholder value on Oxford Street

On Monday 23 June 2008 the BBC Panorama programme reported that Indian suppliers of the high-street chain Primark had been sub-contracting work to firms who used child labour.

Primark had previously issued a statement saying that this sub-contracting had occurred without its knowledge or consent and was forbidden by its code of practice. Primark also stated that they had been let down by three trusted suppliers and had terminated their contracts.

Primark also announced plans to appoint a non-governmental organisation to improve the monitoring system that it already had in place. In addition, Primark is setting up a charity to help young people in the areas in which it operates.

The speed with which Primark has acted is not surprising given the amount of bad publicity generated. The viewing figures suggest that 4.1 million viewers tuned in and the story has provided excellent copy for the national press.

Primark's swift action may well mean that it suffers no lasting damage. This case nevertheless

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll