header-logo header-logo

08 May 2015 / Alexander Hill-Smith
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Money, money money…

nlj_may_8_alexander-hill-smith

Alexander Hill-Smith reviews the new regime for high-cost short-term lending

In recent years, there has been increasing concern about the scale of high-cost short-term borrowing (HCSTC). The volume of transactions is large; borrowers entered into 10.2 million loans of this type totaling £2.8bn in the calendar year 2012/2013. Since then, there has been a decline, perhaps on account of the adverse publicity HCSTC has received, but the volume and amount lent is still considerable. Many of the loans are for small amounts, the average being £260, but there is no financial ceiling on the size of a HCSTC loan.

Public concern is fully justified. These agreements are inevitably expensive in proportion to the size of the advance. While the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recognised that a legitimate role exists for such agreements to cater for situations of temporary financial emergency of a non-recurrent nature, it is plain that hardship has occurred because too many agreements have been entered into in the past. In particular loans have been made to persons unable to repay

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll