header-logo header-logo

Money laundering: understanding risk

30 October 2019
Issue: 7862 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Fraud , Legal services , Regulatory , Technology
printer mail-detail
Half of law firms do not understand the money laundering risks facing them, according to research from LexisNexis Risk Solutions. 

Nevertheless, 76% of firms anticipated increasing their technology budgets as part of anti-money laundering resources over the next five years. The report, ‘On the frontline: the UK’s fight against money laundering’, published this week, also uncovered that lawyers believe there are too many supervisory bodies and that streamlining regulatory supervision would make it more effective. Michael Harris, a director at LexisNexis Risk Solutions, said: ‘Training and education on financial crime risks is essential.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll