header-logo header-logo

13 July 2017
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ moves to stem bout of post-holiday sickness claims

A loophole excluding holiday sickness claims from the fixed recoverable costs regime could be closed to tackle a surge in suspicious claims, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said.

Currently, most personal injury claims are subject to fixed recoverable costs—but not where the incident happened abroad. The MoJ said this week it was responding to travel industry concerns over increasing numbers of suspected bogus claims for gastric illnesses, with some touts operating in European resorts.

It said a 500% rise in claims since 2013 has not been matched in other countries, and warned the trend risks driving up package holiday costs as well as ruining the reputation of Brits abroad. Tour operators say the cost of fighting claims can be out of proportion to the damages claimed, since legal costs are not controlled.

Helen Pugh, barrister at 3 Hare Court, said: ‘It is surely undeniable that there are surprising numbers of claimants and “enablers” who are abusing the system by bringing fraudulent sickness claims.

‘But are fixed fees the way forward? So-called “sickness claims” often involve complicated microbiological disputes about the source of the illness, be it contaminated food or a virus or something else.

‘Injury cases, and some illness cases, will depend upon expert evidence from specialists in standards in the holiday jurisdiction. Analysing this evidence, devising tactics and contentious hearings will frequently require counsel’s involvement.

‘The success and fairness of any fixed fee regime will need to reflect the variety, complexity and intrinsic cost of running many of these types of claims. Get the balance right and fraudsters beware. Get the balance wrong and all claimants beware.’

Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll