header-logo header-logo

30 April 2009 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance , Technology
printer mail-detail

Modern protection

Peter Causton examines new types of claims in the modern world

When people refer to a professional indemnity claim, they are usually thinking about a claim against a traditional type of professional, such as a solicitor, surveyor or accountant, who normally carries compulsory insurance.

However, we are seeing an increase in technological convergence, whereby computing, media and communication networks are interlinked. Increasingly, business itself is being conducted in digital media spaces across a network of interconnecting devices. This is affecting traditional professional service sectors as well, with IT rapidly affecting their method of provision.

However, despite the expansion of media and IT businesses in the UK they are often the last to see the need for professional indemnity insurance. Contracting parties are increasingly demanding insurance cover as part of the contractual negotiations, but it is not compulsory. Cover can be obtained for:

      
      ●     technology and telecoms companies;

      
      ●     broadcasters and publishers; and

      
      ●     direct marketing companies.

Media and technology professionals need to consider obtaining insurance if they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll