header-logo header-logo

09 October 2018
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mistley keeps its village green

The quay in the picturesque Essex town of Mistley was properly registered as a ‘village green’, the Court of Appeal has held in a victory for local campaigners.

The decision, in TW Logistics v Tucker [2018] EWCA Civ 2172, means the area of waterfront at Mistley Quay remains available for the recreational use of the local residents.

In 2008, TW Logistics, which owns the port, erected Heras fencing along the edge of the quay, prompting locals to bring a legal challenge. Represented by Birketts partner Nigel Farthing, they applied for registration of the quay as a village green. A public inquiry was held to determine the issue. Once registered, however, TW sought the removal of the quay from the register of town and village greens.

TW argued that the laws protecting village greens would lead to them committing a criminal offence when using the quay. However, the Court of Appeal rejected this argument.

Lord Justice Lindblom said: ‘A landowner will be free, and indeed has the right, to continue in his previous commercial or other activities on the land after registration, so long as he does not interfere with the corresponding right of local inhabitants to continue in their use of it for recreation.’

Richard Eaton, partner at Birketts, who defended the campaigners in the case, said: ‘Mistley is a working port and a key issue in the litigation has been the examination of how the law treats the co-existing interests of the landowner and the inhabitants. The decision sheds valuable light on the post registration rights of each, and how they can continue with sensible give and take and common sense.'

Issue: 7812 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll