header-logo header-logo

Minimum income upheld

23 February 2017
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Supreme Court has unanimously rejected a legal challenge to the £18,600 minimum income rule for British citizens seeking to bring non-European Economic Area spouses into the UK, in R (oao MM (Lebanon) & Ors) v Home Secretary [2017] UKSC 10. However, the Justices did criticise Home Office rules for failing to look at the treatment of children or consider alternative assets when examining the earning ability of the British spouse. The minimum income rule was introduced by then Home Secretary Theresa May in 2012.

Issue: 7735 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll