header-logo header-logo

Mind the trips & slips (Pt 3)

04 September 2015 / HH Judge Simon Brown KC
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7666_backpage

HHJ Simon Brown tussles with time for costs & consequential orders

At 3.30pm I gave judgment for the claimant for £1,250 (50% contributory negligence). CPR 28.6.5 estimates that there are 30 minutes to go for “costs and consequential orders”. We shall see, and only the defendant’s counsel had brought a White Book with him.

Statements of costs

The court clerk then handed me the statement of costs (summary assessment) filed by the claimants correctly more than two days before the trial (CPR 28.6.6). Ironically, I already had the defendant’s statement because it was filed out of time to the wrong court section marked “urgent” so that someone brought it to my chambers shortly before the hearing! They were in a form that I was familiar with but not in the Precedent H format that is easier to fathom how and why costs are incurred. Anyway, I looked at the grand totals:…wait for it…£5,353 (defendant)…and….£33,065 (claimant)!

Successful party?

Both parties claimed to be the “successful” one! As a first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll