header-logo header-logo

24 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Merging to defend

Cost cutting linked to marked rise in law firm mergers

Cost cutting has led to a sharp rise in mergers of law firms in the last year, according to new research.

Last year, 220 law firm mergers took place, compared with 168 in the previous year—a jump of 31%. However, a survey of 50 law firms by independent finance provider Syscap suggests defensive rather than expansive reasons are driving the trend. The survey was carried out among firms ranging from sole practitioners to large City practices.

More than half said reducing support-staff costs was a major motivation to merge, while more than two-thirds said cutting costs by sharing IT and marketing spend would be a major factor. More than a third said reducing the debt burden of one of the law firms involved would be a major reason.

However, nearly two-thirds of law firms said offering a wider range of services to clients was another reason to merge.

Philip White, CEO of Syscap, says: “This far through the recession we were a little surprised that so many respondents still feel that there are easy efficiencies to be found through trimming staff.

“Smaller law firms are also pursuing mergers so that they can diversify their revenues away from a particular business sector—at the moment that seems to be more of a priority than moving into a faster-growing sector or country.”

Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll