header-logo header-logo

Menstruation & the menopause: righting wrongs at work

03 May 2024 / Nabila Mallick
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Harassment
printer mail-detail
169545
Nabila Mallick discusses the law & potential legal developments relating to menstruation & menopause in the workplace
  • Covers case law on employment claims concerning menstruation or menopause.
  • Considers potential for bringing such claims.

Despite women comprising 48% of the workforce, the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) fails, surprisingly, to provide protection from discrimination or harassment for the specific characteristics of menstruation or menopause, which together span the entirety of the average woman’s working life. This has meant that the issue is ignored by employers in workplace policies and, in turn, female employees often remain silent while suffering from sometimes debilitating symptoms. Most women simply do not know how they could be protected.

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) in 2019 found that 73% of women aged 40 to 60 have experienced menopausal symptoms, with more than half able to think of a time when they couldn’t work due to their symptoms. Further, 67% of women identified with negative experiences in the workplace and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll