header-logo header-logo

To mediate or not to mediate?

Catriona Stewart discusses the possible cost consequences of delayed or abandoned mediation attempts

Can a party avoid a costs sanction if they choose not to mediate? The recent case of Car Giant Limited and Anor v London Borough of Hammersmith [2017] EWHC 464 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 104 (Mar) would indicate possibly, but only if based on well-thought grounds which are communicated to the other party.

Costs judgment

Car Giant concerned a costs judgment where the claimants had failed to beat a Pt 36 offer. The court was asked to award costs both before and after the expiry of the relevant period on an indemnity basis. The argument in support of the later period was that there had been an unreasonable delay in agreeing to mediate. The delay was from 15 May 2015 until October 2016. The court considered that it should be slow to criticise a party’s behaviour where decisions such as when to mediate are matters

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll