header-logo header-logo

The Medco experiment

09 October 2015 / Theo Richardson-Gool
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7671_gool

Curtailing RTA fraud is important, but the solution is not MedCo, as Theo Richardson-Gool explains

Since early April practitioners have had to use the Medco portal for experts and medical agencies for all soft tissue injury claims entering the Road Traffic Accidents Portal. MedCo was introduced as part of the plans to clamp down on fraudulent claims, signaling a stated commitment by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to end the era of “questionable whiplash claims by making sure all medical reports are above suspicion”.

The MedCo portal offers the user the option of instructing a “Direct Medical Expert” or “Medical Reporting Organisation” (MROs), both of which require some initial information to be input into the portal which then produces a randomised list of experts and MROs. This “Direct Medical Expert search” displays the results of seven independent medical experts within a 5 to 30 mile radius of the injured party, but does not display the experts’ CVs nor show all of the locations where the experts have medical appointments or even the days and times of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll