header-logo header-logo

07 December 2022
Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-detail

Measuring progress on diversity

Nine out of ten chambers responding have adopted at least one recommendation from the Bar Council’s ‘Race at the Bar’ report last year, according to an interim progress survey.

Some 69 chambers and organisations representing 4,306 barristers responded to the survey. One third of these had taken action across all four priority areas highlighted in the report: access, retention, progression and culture.

Chambers identified a lack of people (62%) and a lack of time (61%) as the key challenges in tackling race inequality.

Just 8.7% of respondents reported not taking any action.

Bar chair Mark Fenhalls KC said: ‘We want those who have taken action to help spread their good practice to support and collaborate with others.

‘And we want those who haven’t yet started to pick just one or two actions. The Bar Council is here to support chambers, organisations and individuals with information, training, and advice.’ The progress report and other resources are available here.

Meanwhile, research published last week by non-profit social equality consultancy the Bridge Group into the Judicial Diversity Forum (JDF) has highlighted a need to set targets and milestones. The JDF, which launched in 2015, is a collective of organisations such as the Bar Council, CILEX and the Legal Services Board (LSB).

The Bridge Group researchers found most JDF members believe it needs more clearly defined aims, more coordinated actions and more collaboration between member organisations. They proposed nine high-level goals for the JDF to monitor and evaluate progress, such as ensuring that ‘at each level of the judiciary, the judiciary better reflects the society it serves’.

The researchers also suggested the JDF adopt specific and measurable descriptions of the changes it wants to achieve, and change its action plan to include group rather than individual initiatives.

Matthew Hill, chief executive of the LSB, said the JDF would incorporate the recommendations into its actions and priorities.

Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll