header-logo header-logo

26 November 2013
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Maurice Cheng—ACL

First chief executive for Association of Costs Lawyers

The Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) has named Maurice Cheng as its first professional chief executive officer.

He will act as the focal point of the ACL’s campaign highlighting the importance of solicitors only using qualified and regulated costs specialists in the costs management era.

Maurice is currently part-time chief executive of the British Osteopathic Association, and has over 10 years’ board-level experience of leading change and transformation in professional bodies. He has served on the executive board of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, the Institute of Healthcare Management, and the Chartered Institute of Payroll Professionals. He has also been a strategy consultant to the Bar Standards Board and the General Optical Council.

Maurice will have wide-ranging responsibility for running and promoting the ACL, acting as its primary ambassador and growing its membership and revenues. His appointment is core to a programme of change the ACL Council has approved to modernise and professionalise the organisation, focusing on leadership, operations and external affairs.

ACL chairman Murray Heining says: “Maurice’s appointment marks the start of a new era for the ACL. Hitherto we have relied on Council members giving up their time to push the association forward, and outstanding though their contribution has been for many years, there is only so much that can be achieved this way. By having a dedicated CEO, particularly one with Maurice’s experience, I believe we will accelerate our work to ensure that costs lawyers are at the heart of the new legal landscape.”

Issue: 7586 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll