header-logo header-logo

Matters of trust

10 December 2009 / Malcolm Skinner
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

The Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009, explained by Malcolm Skinner

With the advent of the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 there will be a collective sigh of relief from students .

Or will there be?

While the Act may have received Royal Assent, it still has to be implemented which is not likely to happen until after the middle of 2010 so we will have to continue with the old law for the time being.

The old law is contained in common law and in the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964 (PAA 1964) and provides that a future interest must vest (to prevent it being perpetually  inalienable) at common law, within a life or lives in being at the date of the disposition plus 21 years and under the Act, within a period of up to 80 years as specified or 21 years in the case of an option in respect of land.

In respect of the accumulation of income the permitted periods are:
l the lifetime of the grantor/settler.
l 21 years from their death.
l the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll